Madoff Feeder Fund Costs Morgan Keegan

Firm ordered to pay couple $250,000 in FINRA arbitration

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Trading Practices and Errors When SEC-registered investment advisors conduct annual audits of firm policies and procedures, they should pay close attention to trading practices.  Though usually not required to, state-registered advisors should look at their trading practices and revise policies that do not fully protect clients.
  • Advertising Advisor Services and Credentials Section 206 of the Investment Advisers Act contains the anti-fraud provision of the statute and ensures that RIAs’ advertising and marketing practices are consistent with the fiduciary duty owed to clients and prospective clients.   

After finding that Morgan Keegan, a unit of Regions Financial, failed to do sufficient due diligence on a hedge fund that was a feeder fund for Bernard L. Madoff Securities, a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel has ordered the firm to pay a Florida couple more than $250,000.

Reuters reported that Morgan Keegan’s clients, Jeffrey and Marisel Lieberman, put the entire value of their account, $200,000, into the hedge fund, Greenwich Sentry LP. The fund filed for bankruptcy in November of 2010. The panel said that, according to Morgan Keegan’s own compliance rules, clients should never be invested in hedge funds unless they have listed “speculation” as one of their primary objectives. The Liebermans had listed that as their last investment objective. The panel also said that the firm had not done much due diligence, never requesting an audited report from Madoff’s firm or even searching the Internet for information about the fund.

The panel wrote, "There is clear and convincing evidence that ... Morgan Keegan was grossly negligent in not performing substantial due diligence and as a result it fraudulently misrepresented the risk of this investment." It ordered the company to pay not only the full $200,000, but also 6% annual interest from the investment date in May of 2007, as well as $50,000 in punitive damages and $14,000 in expert witness fees.

A Morgan Keegan spokesperson said, when asked for comment, "We disagree with the panel's finding in this case and plan to appeal the award."

The Liebermans’ advisor was cleared of wrongdoing by the panel, which found that he was unaware of the lack of due diligence done by the firm and thus did not know that the information he gave his clients about the fund was misleading.

Morgan Keegan, according to the report, has been involved in hundreds of arbitrations over the past year from clients invested in mutual funds that had lost more than 50% in value thanks to subprime mortgage exposure.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.