Madoff Feeder Fund Costs Morgan Keegan

Firm ordered to pay couple $250,000 in FINRA arbitration

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Registration Requirements for Investment Advisor Representatives (IARs) When individuals launch an advisory firm, they must avoid marketing themselves or the firm as investment advisors before they are properly approved and registered.  Otherwise, they are subject to severe penalties.  
  • RIAs and Customer Identification Just as RIAs owe a duty to diligently protect their clients’ privacy and guard against theft, firms also play a vital role in customer identification. Although RIAs are not subject to an anti-money laundering rule, securities regulators expect advisors to address these issues in their policies and procedures.

After finding that Morgan Keegan, a unit of Regions Financial, failed to do sufficient due diligence on a hedge fund that was a feeder fund for Bernard L. Madoff Securities, a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel has ordered the firm to pay a Florida couple more than $250,000.

Reuters reported that Morgan Keegan’s clients, Jeffrey and Marisel Lieberman, put the entire value of their account, $200,000, into the hedge fund, Greenwich Sentry LP. The fund filed for bankruptcy in November of 2010. The panel said that, according to Morgan Keegan’s own compliance rules, clients should never be invested in hedge funds unless they have listed “speculation” as one of their primary objectives. The Liebermans had listed that as their last investment objective. The panel also said that the firm had not done much due diligence, never requesting an audited report from Madoff’s firm or even searching the Internet for information about the fund.

The panel wrote, "There is clear and convincing evidence that ... Morgan Keegan was grossly negligent in not performing substantial due diligence and as a result it fraudulently misrepresented the risk of this investment." It ordered the company to pay not only the full $200,000, but also 6% annual interest from the investment date in May of 2007, as well as $50,000 in punitive damages and $14,000 in expert witness fees.

A Morgan Keegan spokesperson said, when asked for comment, "We disagree with the panel's finding in this case and plan to appeal the award."

The Liebermans’ advisor was cleared of wrongdoing by the panel, which found that he was unaware of the lack of due diligence done by the firm and thus did not know that the information he gave his clients about the fund was misleading.

Morgan Keegan, according to the report, has been involved in hundreds of arbitrations over the past year from clients invested in mutual funds that had lost more than 50% in value thanks to subprime mortgage exposure.

Reprints Discuss this story