Boards Getting Tougher on Risk and Clawbacks: Conference Board study

Study shows directors elected primarily by majority votes

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Client Commission Practices and Soft Dollars RIAs should always evaluate whether the products and services they receive from broker-dealers are appropriate. The SEC suggested that an RIA’s failure to stay within the scope of the Section 28(e) safe harbor may violate the advisor’s fiduciary duty to clients, so RIAs must evaluate their soft dollar relationships on a regular basis to ensure they are disclosed properly and that they do not negatively impact the best execution of clients’ transactions.
  • Dealings With Qualified Clients and Accredited Investors Depending upon an RIAs business model and investment strategies, it may be important to identify “qualified clients” and “accredited investors.”  The Dodd-Frank Act authorized the SEC to change which clients are defined by those terms.

More boards are adopting clawback provisions, and looking more closely at risk oversight, according to a survey released on Monday by The Conference Board.

In the 2010 U.S. Directors’ Compensation and Board Practices Report, based on data gathered in May and June, questions spanned a broader range of subjects than previously, including CEO succession planning, say-on-pay, and gross-ups, as well as the aforementioned clawback provisions.

Matteo Tonello, director of corporate governance research at The Conference Board and an author of the report, said in a statement, “Over the last decade, our annual study has documented a steady transformation in the role of public companies’ boards, underscoring the increasing importance of directors’ monitoring responsibilities and the growing influence of shareholders. The new developments of the last few months alone, from the SEC regulation on disclosure enhancement to the governance provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, illustrate the importance of capturing the practices we have added to our annual survey.”

Among other findings, the survey recorded that director compensation was more a factor of company size than of industry; the larger the company, the higher the compensation. Large financial services boards were found to be the least diverse, with the largest relative proportion of members who are CEOs, presidents, or board chairs of for-profit companies, rather than academics or accountants.

Larger companies are starting to institute clawback provisions; at least 40% of companies in the manufacturing and non-financial services industries have them, as do 36.6% of financial firms. Financial services companies are the ones primarily using say-on-pay. Nearly all financial companies with asset values of $10 billion or higher have a dedicated chief risk officer. And outside of the financial services industry, only 14.7% (manufacturing) and 18.3% (non-financial services) disclose succession planning to shareholders.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.