Kanjorski: SIPA Coverage Should Be Extended to Investment Advisors’ Clients

Congress mulls changes to entity that 'failed' investors

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • RIAs and Customer Identification Just as RIAs owe a duty to diligently protect their clients’ privacy and guard against theft, firms also play a vital role in customer identification. Although RIAs are not subject to an anti-money laundering rule, securities regulators expect advisors to address these issues in their policies and procedures.
  • How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Compliance Exam There is much more to compliance examination survival than knowing all of the rules. It helps to understand why the rules were put in place—and to recognize that examiners are not the enemy.

Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa., chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets said Thursday that Congress should consider expanding the Securities Investor Protection Act's coverage to investment advisors' clients, as investment advisors "may also commit fraud."

Kanjorski made his comments as the subcommittee explored SIPA's limitations, a law designed to return money and securities to the customers of failed brokerages. The Securities Investor Protection Corp. (SIPC) is the entity charged with implementing SIPA.

To better protect the customers of failed brokerages going forward, Kanjorski said in his opening remarks that the Dodd-Frank Act increases cash protection limits and bolsters the resources of the reserve fund used to replace customers' missing cash and securities. Dodd-Frank also "quintuples penalties for misrepresentations of membership in or protections offered by the Securities Investor Protection Corp. Moreover, the statute makes important changes to prevent, rather than simply replace, the loss of customer property, including new custody safeguards for customer assets held by certain financial professionals."

The victims of the Bernie Madoff and Robert Stanford Ponzi schemes, Kanjorski said, believed that "SIPC has fallen short in meeting its responsibilities, and they want more change. I do, too."

Rep. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., ranking GOP member on the subcommittee agreed that SIPC had "lost the trust of many investors, and members of Congress." Garrett said one measure that would help provide relief to Ponzi scheme victims is H.R. 5058, the Ponzi Scheme Victims Tax Relief Act, a bill that he introduced in April along with William Pascrell, D-N.J.; the bill aims to provide special rules for investments lost in a fraudulent Ponzi-type scheme.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.