More On Legal & Compliancefrom The Advisor's Professional Library
- Using Solicitors to Attract Clients Rule 206(4)-3 under the Investment Advisors Act establishes requirements governing cash payments to solicitors. The rule permits payment of cash referral fees to individuals and companies recommending clients to an RIA, but requires four conditions are first satisfied.
- Client Commission Practices and Soft Dollars RIAs should always evaluate whether the products and services they receive from broker-dealers are appropriate. The SEC suggested that an RIAs failure to stay within the scope of the Section 28(e) safe harbor may violate the advisors fiduciary duty to clients, so RIAs must evaluate their soft dollar relationships on a regular basis to ensure they are disclosed properly and that they do not negatively impact the best execution of clients transactions.
A provision of the health care reform legislation that requires businesses and nonprofits to file 1099 forms with the IRS for all payments of $600 or more to a single vendor has been a bugaboo since its passage, with businesses and trade groups calling for its repeal.
Two different attempts to do that Tuesday, in the form of amendments to the small business relief bill that passed the Senate, were defeated.
The Johanns amendment (SA 4596), proposed by Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., would have repealed the requirement altogether, but would have paid for the lost revenue the requirement would have generated by gutting the Prevention and Public Health Fund, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. It failed.
The Nelson amendment (SA 4595), proposed by Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., sought to increase the requirement floor from $600 to $5,000, and reduce tax subsidies and loopholes for oil companies to pay for the measure. It, too, failed.
The National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC) expressed concern on Wednesdayin the wake of the vote on the Johanns amendment. Jimi Grande, senior vice president of federal and political affairs for NAMIC, said in a statement, “Only in Washington would you find the twisted logic that rejects the Johanns amendment, which provides a clear benefit to businesses and charities, from a bill designed to provide relief for small businesses.”
Prevention Instituteexpressed gratitude at the defeat of the Johanns amendment, calling it a “victory for prevention.” In a statement, Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, said, “Today the Senate voted to block an attack on the Prevention Trust Fund—an attack that represented the same old penny-wise-pound-foolish thinking that now makes America's health care system so costly and ineffective.”
The Prevention Institute cited statistics in favor of retaining the Prevention and Public Health Fund: “Medical costs fall by about $3.27 for every dollar spent on wellness programs and absenteeism costs fall by about $2.73 for every dollar spent. Workplace wellness programs have long-term health and cost-saving benefits, saving one company $4.8 million in employee health and lost work time costs over nine years.”