Goldman Sachs Settles SEC Fraud Suit for $550 Million

Record penalty and acknowledgement that 'Goldman misled investors.'

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • The New and Improved Form ADV Whether an RIA is describing its investment strategy in advertisements or in the new Form ADV Part 2, it is important the firm articulates material risks faced by advisory clients and avoids language that might be construed as a guarantee.
  • Differences Between State and SEC Regulation of Investment Advisors States may impose licensing or registration requirements on IARs doing business in their jurisdiction, even if the IAR works for an SEC-registered firm.  States may investigate and prosecute fraud by any IAR in their jurisdiction, even if the individual works for an SEC-registered firm.
Goldman Sachs settled fraud charges brought in April by the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with a collateralized debt obligation (CDO), the SEC announced Thursday, July 15. According to the announcement, Goldman Sachs agreed to pay a record $550 million to investors that bought the security and to the U.S. Treasury.

The April fraud charge alleged that "Goldman failed to disclose to investors vital information about the CDO, known as ABACUS 2007-AC1, particularly the role that hedge fund Paulson & Co. Inc. played in the portfolio selection process and the fact that Paulson had taken a short position against the CDO," according to the SEC news release. (See "SEC Charges Goldman Sachs with Fraud.")

Of the $550 million, $150 million will be paid to Deutsche Industriebank AG, and $100 million will go to Royal Bank of Scotland, which was "formerly known as ABN AMRO Bank N.V." according to the Goldman Sachs judgment. The balance, $300 million, will go to the SEC which must turn it over to the U.S. Treasury.

"Half a billion dollars is the largest penalty ever assessed against a financial services firm in the history of the SEC," said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement. "This settlement is a stark lesson to Wall Street firms that no product is too complex, and no investor too sophisticated, to avoid a heavy price if a firm violates the fundamental principles of honest treatment and fair dealing."

In the Goldman Sachs Consent filed with the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, Goldman Sachs acknowledged the following:

Goldman acknowledges that the marketing materials for the ABACUS 2007-AC1 transaction contained incomplete information. In particular, it was a mistake for the Goldman marketing materials to state that the reference portfolio was "selected by" ACA Management LLC without disclosing the role of Paulson & Co. Inc. in the portfolio selection process and that Paulson's economic interests were adverse to CDO investors. Goldman regrets that the marketing materials did not contain that disclosure.

The settlement will not be final until Barbara S. Jones, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York approves it.

Comments? Please send them to kmcbride@wealthmanagerweb.com. Kate McBride is editor in chief of Wealth Manager and a member of The Committee for the Fiduciary Standard.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.