In Reform Bill, Fiduciary Duty, EIA Regulation Face Vote on June 22

Proposal to give states oversight of more advisors also in play

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Updating Form ADV and Form U4 When it comes to disclosure on Form ADV, RIAs should assume information would be material to investors.  When in doubt, RIAs should disclose information rather than arguing later with securities regulators that it was not material.
  • The Custody Rule and its Ramifications When an RIA takes custody of a client’s funds or securities, risk to that individual increases dramatically. Rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment Advisers Act (better known as the Custody Rule), was passed to protect clients from unscrupulous investors.

As the Senate and House conferees get back to work on Tuesday, June 22, the critical vote on whether to apply a fiduciary standard to brokers is expected. The conferees will also vote on whether to approve an amendment offered by Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) that would classify equity indexed annuities (EIAs) as insurance products, and therefore preempt having EIAs regulated as securities by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Connecticut) has said that Senator Tim Johnson (D-South Dakota) is working on a compromise to the House's language calling for a fiduciary duty for brokers. Johnson drafted the original language calling for an SEC study of gaps in regulation for advisors and brokers, instead of imposing a fiduciary duty on brokers, as set out in the House bill.

The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) is also pleased that the conferees have agreed to raise the state investment advisor asset threshold from $25 million to $100 million in assets under management (AUM) and permit state advisors within $25 million to $100 million in AUM that are required to be registered in 15 or more states to remain being examined by the SEC.

But SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro has raised concerns about whether the states would have adequate means to regulate the onslaught of new advisory firms to examine; raising the asset threshold would shift about 4,200 SEC-registered advisors to state jurisdiction. Denise Voigt Crawford, president of NASAA and the Texas Securities Commissioner, said in a recent conference call with reporters that the SEC has failed to examine about 3,000 advisory firms, so if the states win jurisdiction over more firms "that would be an improvement." The SEC, Crawford continued, has stated that the agency plans to focus its examination efforts on the larger advisory firms.

Other critics worry that with state budgets in turmoil, the states will lack the adequate resources to exam advisory firms. But Crawford said during the conference call that while it's true that some "states are experiencing major resource problems; states are not actively cutting budgets for securities related efforts." Crawford also pointed out that the states have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in which they will combine their resources when examining advisors.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.