More On Legal & Compliancefrom The Advisor's Professional Library
- Differences Between State and SEC Regulation of Investment Advisors States may impose licensing or registration requirements on IARs doing business in their jurisdiction, even if the IAR works for an SEC-registered firm. States may investigate and prosecute fraud by any IAR in their jurisdiction, even if the individual works for an SEC-registered firm.
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Information This information sheet contains general information about certain provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and selected rules under the Advisers Act. It also provides information about the resources available from the SEC to help advisors understand and comply with these laws and rules.
Sheila Bair, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) and Mary Schapiro, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), conceded to federal crisis investigators January 14 that regulators did indeed drop the ball in preventing the financial meltdown.
During the second round of hearings held by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) in Washington January 14, Denise Voigt Crawford, Texas Securities Commissioner and president of the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), told the federal investigative panel in her testimony that three actions should occur to prevent further potential crisis.
First, restore provisions of Glass-Steagall, the 1933 law that created a wall between commercial and investment banking. In fact, a bipartisan bill recently introduced by Senators Maria Cantwell (D-Washington), John McCain (R-Arizona), Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin), and others would do just that by prohibiting commercial banks from affiliating in any manner with investment banks. "By separating the commercial banks from the investment banks, the Cantwell-McCain bill would end speculation with depositors' money and return stability and confidence to Main Street," Crawford said.
Second, Congress should reinstate state regulatory oversight of Rule 506 offerings by repealing Section 18(b)(4)(D) of the Securities Act of 1933, Crawford said. Section 928 of Senator Christopher Dodd's financial services reform bill, the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2009, would reinstate the authority of state regulators over Rule 506 offerings. "Most hedge funds are offered pursuant to Rule 506, so state securities regulators are prevented from examining the offering documents of these investments, which represents an enormous dollar volume," Crawford said. "Although Congress preserved the states' authority to take enforcement actions for fraud in the offer and sale of all 'covered' securities, including Rule 506 offerings, this power is no substitute for a state's ability to scrutinize offerings for signs of potential abuse and to ensure that disclosure is adequate beforeharm is done to investors."
Third, Crawford suggested increasing state regulation of investment advisors. "As evidenced by the Inspector General's report on the Madoff affair and the testimony of SEC Chairman Schapiro and other SEC staff before Congress, the bulk of federally covered investment advisers are examined infrequently," she said. NASAA members, she continued, "are fully prepared and equipped to fill this gap by accepting responsibility for the oversight of investment advisers with up to $100 million in assets under management."