Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
A Merrill Lynch branch office

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > FINRA

Merrill Lynch to Pay $825K Over Best Execution Issues

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Merrill Lynch has agreed to pay the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority $825,000 for failing to establish and maintain a supervisory system reasonably designed to achieve compliance with its best execution obligations for certain retail equities orders.

According to FINRA’s order, the issues occurred from at least February 2017 through the present.

Specifically, Merrill “failed to reasonably supervise that marketable equity orders entered into the firm’s electronic order systems were executed promptly,” the order states, violating FINRA Rules 3110 and 2010.

During the same period, “Merrill did not reasonably supervise for compliance with SEC and FINRA recordkeeping requirements pertaining to retail brokerage equity order memoranda,” FINRA said.

In particular, the firm “did not conduct a supervisory review to ensure the accuracy of retail brokerage equity order memoranda for orders received electronically.”

From at least February 2017 through the present, “external investment managers, financial advisers, and customers entered equity orders into the firm’s electronic order systems,” FINRA states. “The firm performed validation checks on the orders before ultimately routing the orders to a market center for further handling and/or execution.”

During this period, Merrill’s supervisory system, including its written supervisory procedures, “was not reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the requirements of Rule 5310.01 in so far as Merrill only reviewed the execution timeliness of orders processed through the firm’s electronic order systems from the time the orders were routed to a market center for further handling or execution and the final execution time,” according to the order.

Merrill “did not conduct a supervisory review of how long it took the firm’s electronic order systems to process and route the orders to a market center,” FINRA said.

“By omitting from its supervisory reviews the electronic order systems’ order handling time from order receipt to the route time to a market center, Merrill failed to reasonably supervise whether it made every effort to execute marketable customer orders that it received fully and promptly,” it added.

Merrill also failed to “conduct supervisory reviews to ensure the accuracy of information recorded on the firm’s order memoranda for retail brokerage equity orders the firm received electronically.”


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.