Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Image of a gavel on an open book and the words Fiduciary Rule, along with the logo of the US Dept. of Labor

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > DOL

Fee Savings From DOL Fiduciary Rule Could Top $55B: Morningstar

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • Participants in small plans will likely feel most of the impact, according to a Morningstar report.
  • Fixed indexed annuity buyers could save another $32 billion as insurance companies reduce commissions.
  • Legal challenges could delay or derail the projected savings.

The Labor Department released the much-anticipated final version of its new fiduciary regulations for investment advisors in April. As expected, publication of the Retirement Security Rule quickly sparked a wave of comments and analysis from a variety of advisory industry stakeholders.

Much of the commentary has so far centered on the potential business effects of the final regulations on wealth managers, brokers, insurance agents and other financial services professionals working with retirement assets, but a new report published by Morningstar researchers Spencer Look and Lia Mitchell asks a different question. Namely, what might be the long-term impact on the fees and expenses paid by the average investor?

The potential effect is significant, according to Look and Mitchell, ranging as high as $55 billion in collective fee savings for retirement plan participants over the coming decade. Another $32.5 billion could be saved by investors rolling over into annuity products sold under a stricter fiduciary standard during the same time period.

Discussing their analysis in an interview with ThinkAdvisor, Look and Mitchell said their findings were based on a few key considerations, beginning with the fact that the new rule and requirements around prohibited transaction exemptions will likely result in retirement plan fiduciaries reexamining their investment lineups and the fees their investments charge. In doing so, they will need to ensure their recommendations are prudent and their fees are reasonable, likely resulting in movement toward higher-value products.

Perhaps most notable, according to Look and Mitchell, is the fact that over 80% of the workplace retirement plan savings would be experienced by participants in small plans, of which there are currently more than 20 million. This segment of the marketplace has not yet adopted some of the fiduciary best practices put in place at larger and more sophisticated companies offering retirement plans, the duo explained.

Ultimately, the rule will likely bring substantial benefits to retirement investors, according to Look and Mitchell, but this outcome will not materialize overnight. Adding to the uncertainty, multiple trade groups have criticized the final rule, and the consensus is that legal challenges could delay or derail the projected savings.

As Look and Mitchell explained, the fiduciary rule covers cases where an investor is saving for retirement through a workplace retirement plan, such as a 401(k), or other type of retirement plan, such as an IRA. Broadly speaking, financial professionals working with these account types must provide best-interest service while mitigating and disclosing potential conflicts of interest.

How Investors Could Be Affected

Look and Mitchell find all types of investors could feel some ancillary effects of the final fiduciary rule, but they find two specific groups are likely to see the biggest impact. These are investors in small retirement plans and investors rolling assets into certain fixed annuity products.

With respect to the former group, Look and Mitchell estimate that average all-in investment and administration costs for workers covered by a small plan would drop to 75 basis points from 93 basis points. This is a much bigger drop than is anticipated for larger plans, where the average basis point fee on investments is significantly lower thanks to the inherent economies of scale.

Currently, participants in plans with less than $25 million in assets pay nearly twice as much as participants in larger plans, based on the median reported fees as a percentage of assets under management in publicly available disclosures. Smaller plans also have a much higher range of fees, according to Look and Mitchell, which suggests many plans pay unreasonably high fees.

“Firms that aid plan sponsors in the construction of their plan lineups — and that would newly be considered fiduciaries under the new rule — will need to comply with the amended PTEs to receive compensation that would otherwise be prohibited,” the duo wrote. “In doing so, they will need to ensure their recommendations are prudent and their fees are reasonable.”

The researchers expect all participants to save over $55 billion in the first 10 years and over $130 billion in the subsequent 10 years in undiscounted and nominal dollars. They estimate the vast majority (over 80%) of these savings would be experienced by small-plan participants.

The Annuity Picture

Look and Mitchell go on to detail the potential for significant savings for retirement investors rolling into fixed indexed annuities, due mainly to the fact that these products are not currently covered by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation Best Interest.

During the interview, they stressed the importance of the fact that the SEC’s existing rules and the DOL’s final regulation are in close alignment, which should help both consumers and financial professionals understand the rules.

According to the analysis, retirement investors rolling into fixed indexed annuities will save over $32.5 billion in the first 10 years and over $32.5 billion in the subsequent 10 years, again in undiscounted and nominal dollars.

“Although most fixed-index annuities do not have any explicit fees, the investor still pays in the form of lower returns (credited interest rates),” the duo wrote. “This is how the insurance company pays commissions and covers their own costs to distribute the product. When the new rule goes into effect, we think fixed-index annuity commissions will decrease due to insurance producers following the impartial conduct standards. This will result in lower implicit costs, leading to better returns for investors.”

Credit: Chris Nicholls/ALM; Adobe Stock


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.