Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Regulation and Compliance > State Regulation

Critics Blast NAIC State-Accreditation Program as Unconstitutional

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ state accreditation program is unconstitutional because it can coerce states to pass laws, and the NAIC itself has an outsize influence on insurance regulation, critics argued Thursday.

Speaking at the Consumer Federation of America’s financial services conference in Washington, Daniel Schwarcz, professor of law at the University of Minnesota, argued that the NAIC’s state accreditation program is not subject to administrative law, which means the NAIC is not subject to the same laws or procedures that states are.

The NAIC acts as a government entity but has none of the accountability of a government entity, Schwarcz maintains.

“Quite frankly, it’s unconstitutional,” Schwarcz said.

(Related: Republican Questions Constitutionality of Insurance Regulatory System)

The NAIC’s accreditation program was created to establish and maintain financial regulation standards in each state.

The professor, who teaches insurance law, made a splash when he published a paper earlier this year questioning the NAIC’s power with its production of guidance, model laws and manuals that he argued have the force of law because they are incorporated by reference in state insurance codes.

Schwarcz’s paper stated: “Because the NAIC is a private entity, it produces these various materials that have the force of law without being bound by any safeguards that ordinarily accompany the production of regulation, whether at the state or federal level. Moreover, the NAIC uses its unique accreditation program to directly pressure state legislatures to delegate this authority to it. This Article argues that this scheme violates basic separation of powers and non-delegation principles embedded in every state Constitution.”

While it is up to the states to pass via their own legislatures or enact NAIC-crafted model laws and regulations, Schwarcz focused on the “coercive” nature of the state accreditation model created by the NAIC, which he termed a private entity.

The NAIC 2019 budget, approved on Nov. 18, includes total revenues of $110.7 million and total expenses of $118.8 million.

Eric Cioppa, the incoming NAIC president for 2019 and Maine’s superintendent of insurance, stated at the time the budget was released that “officers, members and NAIC staff will ensure the best use of its financial resources and continue prudent financial management, while we ramp up efforts to meet the accelerating pace of innovation and change.”

Birny Birnbaum, director of the Center for Economic Justice and a veteran paid NAIC consumer advocate, stated during the panel that the NAIC has an outsize influence on the regulation of insurance, far greater than state banking and state securities overseers have over banking and securities regulation.

Birnbaum also critiqued the structural aspect of the NAIC, with commissioners from a few small states leading the behemoth nonprofit. In comments before the  panel, Birnabum said he agreed with Schwarcz’s “unconstitutionality” take and that he would even add his own examples.

Ethan Sonnichsen, managing director of government relations for the NAIC, noted during the panel the states that are leading the way and setting the agenda, and emphasized in comments to panelists after the session the efforts to train regulators for the NAIC State Ahead initiative, which is designed to help states move away from a “check the box” type of regulation.

State Ahead, a three-year blueprint for the future, provides state insurance regulators with data, training, talent support, services and new tools to foster a collaborative supervisory environment.

The State Ahead goals are to hone the efficiency and effectiveness of the NAIC structure; maintain stable, solvent and affordable and accessible insurance markets; and protect consumer and insurance information nationwide.

Schwarcz tweeted Thursday after he spoke that he enjoyed chatting about “why US insurance regulation is unconstitutional at CFA financial regulation conference today.”

He called out Sonnichsen for making comments he said reveal “just how troubling NAIC’s role in state insurance regulation really is.”

Schwarcz tweeted that Sonnichsen “described the NAIC’s accreditation program as ‘compelling’ state legislatures to standardize their approach to financial regulation.”

The professor interpreted this to mean that state legislatures are forced by the NAIC state accreditation program “to cede power to the private NAIC,” which NAIC argues is an inaccurate portrayal.

Ironically, the accreditation system concept was developed as a response to several large insurance companies’ insolvencies and a subsequent congressional inquiry in the mid- to late 1980s.

The NAIC began discussing and forming what became the accreditation program in September 1988.

— Read Eric Cioppa to Lead State Insurance Regulator Groupon ThinkAdvisor.

— Connect with ThinkAdvisor Life/Health on LinkedIn and Twitter.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.