Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Life Health > Life Insurance

Low Cost Pumps Up Ancillary Benefits Take-Up Rates

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

U.S. employees who have access to employer-paid ancillary life, health and disability benefits are more likely to take up those benefits than they are to take up employer-paid medical insurance.[@@]

Carl Barsky, an economist at the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, has published tables supporting that argument in an analysis of benefits data from the 2003 National Compensation Survey.

The tables cover survey results for private employers.

The BLS tried to exclude pure employee-paid worksite products from the survey results by asking employers to tell them only about benefits that were at least partly employer-funded, according to Barsky’s analysis, which appears in the August edition of the BLS Monthly Labor Review.

The private establishments surveyed were far more likely to offer employees access to medical insurance than to the other benefits included in the survey. The percentage of employees with access to medical insurance was 60%. That compares with access levels of 50% for life insurance, 40% for dental insurance, 39% for short-term disability insurance, 30% for long-term disability insurance and 25% for vision coverage.

But take-up rates are higher for benefits other than medical insurance.

The average take-up rate for medical insurance was 75%, but the average take-up rate was 76% for vision coverage, 80% for dental insurance, 93% for LTD insurance, 94% for life insurance, and 95% for STD insurance.

Barsky points out that the BLS did not study why employees chose to take up the benefits they took up.

“The decision to participate may be related to whether the employee contributes to the coverage,” Barsky writes.

Barsky suggests that take-up rates might be high for ancillary benefits because employers often pay the full cost of those benefits or require employees to pay only a small share of the full cost.

Barsky’s article also includes tables that break down the participation results by geographic area. General economic conditions and large-scale government employment make the Mountain region, which includes Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming, stand out from the other regions.

Mountain state workers had average or above-average take-up rates for disability coverage in 2003, but they came in last or second to last for every other benefit. When Mountain region employers offered medical insurance in 2003, for example, only 69% of the employees participated, compared with a national average of 75%.

Links to the Barsky article and other articles that draw on BLS survey data are on the Web at http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/mlrhome.htm


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.