SEC Issues FAQ on Proxy Voting for Advisors

'Core concept' of guidance is that advisors have a fiduciary duty to vote proxies in best interests of clients, says IAA's Barr

Advisors may retain proxy advisory firms to help with proxy voting. Advisors may retain proxy advisory firms to help with proxy voting.

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Scope of the Fiduciary Duty Owed by Investment Advisors A fiduciary obligation goes beyond the suitability standard typically owed by registered representatives of broker-dealer firms to clients. The relationship is built on the premise that the advisor will always do the right thing for the person or entity receiving advice.
  • How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Compliance Exam There is much more to compliance examination survival than knowing all of the rules. It helps to understand why the rules were put in place—and to recognize that examiners are not the enemy.

The Securities and Exchange Commission released late Monday guidance on the responsibilities of investment advisors voting proxies on behalf of their clients, particularly in retaining proxy advisory firms.

The guidance, issued by the Division of Investment Management in frequently asked question format, is “intended to respond to criticism by issuers and others that proxy advisory firms face conflicts of interests and that investment advisors rely too heavily on such firms for voting recommendations,” according to the Investment Adviser Association.

Karen Barr, IAA's general counsel, told ThinkAdvisor in an email message that IAA doesn’t believe the guidance presents “any dramatically new concepts for investment advisors,” and that the “core concept is that advisors have a fiduciary duty to vote proxies in the best interests of their clients.”

The guidance “appropriately confirms” that advisors may retain proxy advisory firms to assist in them in carrying out these proxy voting duties, Barr says, and “underscores the fact that the SEC is focusing on these issues, so advisors should review their procedures for conducting due diligence and exercising ongoing oversight with respect to proxy advisory firms they retain.”

Barr says IAA is also “pleased” that the guidance may result in proxy advisory firms proactively providing information about conflicts to advisors.

The SEC held a roundtable last December to discuss the use of proxy advisory firm services by institutional investors and investment advisors.

The guidance sets out examples of steps an advisor could take to demonstrate that it casts proxy votes in accordance with clients’ best interests and the advisor’s proxy voting procedures.

For instance, Question 2 asks whether an investment advisor is required to vote every proxy.

"The Proxy Voting Rule does not require that investment advisors and clients agree that the investment advisor will undertake all of the proxy voting responsibilities," the SEC says. "We understand that in most cases, clients delegate to their investment advisors the authority to vote proxies relating to equity securities."

The guidance says that advisors and proxy advisory firms “may want or need to make changes” to their current systems and processes in light of this guidance. The SEC staff said that it expects any “necessary changes will be made promptly, but in any event in advance of next year’s proxy season.”

The SEC staff also states that an advisor should review the efficacy of its proxy policies at least annually.

The SEC also provided guidance to proxy advisory firms on exemptions to federal proxy rules. The staff emphasized that reliance on one of the exemptions requires proxy advisory firms to disclose material interests or significant relationships to the recipient of proxy voting recommendations.

---

Check out White House Getting Involved With DOL Fiduciary Redraft on ThinkAdvisor.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.