More On Legal & Compliancefrom The Advisor's Professional Library
- Risk-Based Oversight of Investment Advisors Even if the SEC had a larger budget and more resources, it is doubtful that the Commission would have the resources to regularly examine all RIAs. Therefore, the SEC is likely to continue relying on risk-based oversight to fulfill its mission of protecting investors.
- Recent Changes in the Regulatory Landscape 2011 marked a major shift in the regulatory environment, as the SEC adopted rules for implementing the Dodd-Frank Act. Many changes to Investment Advisers Act were authorized by Title IV of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board warned investors Wednesday to be aware of the terms of certain types of direct-pay municipal bonds to better understand if they are affected by the federal budget sequestration.
The alert also reminds broker-dealers and municipal securities dealers of their customer protection obligations under MSRB rules in connection with customer transactions relating to direct-pay bonds.
The MSRB notes that because the terms of direct-pay bonds "may vary considerably from issue to issue, investors, dealers and other market professionals should know the facts about their particular direct-pay bonds and should not make investment or pricing decisions based solely on other direct-pay bonds which may have dissimilar features or on generalized characterizations reported in the press or in other published reports."
As a result of the sequestration that took effect March 1, the Internal Revenue Service reduced refundable credits payable to issuers with respect to their Build America Bonds (BABs), Qualified School Construction Bonds (QSCBs), Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZABs), New Clean Renewable Energy Bonds (New CREBs) and Qualified Energy Conservation Bonds (QECBs) for which the issuer elected to receive a direct credit subsidy from the federal government, collectively known as “direct-pay bonds.”
“While reductions in subsidy payments resulting from sequestration directly affect the issuers of direct-pay bonds, these reductions also have the potential to affect investors buying, selling and holding direct-pay bonds for which such subsidy payments have been reduced,” MSRB says.
For example, the MSRB explains that in some cases, the bonds' terms may permit the issuer to exercise an extraordinary redemption at a price of par if the federal subsidy payment is cut, whereas the terms of other outstanding direct-pay bonds may permit extraordinary redemption only under a more limited set of circumstances (such as a change in law on such subsidy payments) or at a higher “make-whole” redemption price.
“The existence and specific terms of extraordinary redemption provisions, and the determination of whether the circumstances that can trigger the exercise of such extraordinary redemptions have occurred, has the potential of affecting the market value of the applicable direct-pay bond,” MSRB says.
The ruemaking board directs investors and BDs to its Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) website, where they can find free information on the basic terms of direct-pay bonds as described in the official statement produced by the issuer and submitted by the underwriter of the bonds.
Check out PIMCO’s Gross: Fed in a Corner, Will ‘Taper’ by Year’s End on AdvisorOne.