More On Legal & Compliancefrom The Advisor's Professional Library
- Risk-Based Oversight of Investment Advisors Even if the SEC had a larger budget and more resources, it is doubtful that the Commission would have the resources to regularly examine all RIAs. Therefore, the SEC is likely to continue relying on risk-based oversight to fulfill its mission of protecting investors.
- RIAs and Customer Identification Just as RIAs owe a duty to diligently protect their clients privacy and guard against theft, firms also play a vital role in customer identification. Although RIAs are not subject to an anti-money laundering rule, securities regulators expect advisors to address these issues in their policies and procedures.
Massachusetts Securities Regulator William Galvin ordered five independent broker-dealers Wednesday to pay $8.6 million in restitution to investors and fined them a total of $975,000 for improper sales of nontraded REITs.
The firms involved in the settlement are Ameriprise Financial Services, which will pay $2,592,890 in restitution and a $400,000 fine; Commonwealth Financial Network which will pay $2,074,710 in restitution and a $300,000 fine; Royal Alliance Associates, which will pay $59,000 in restitution and a $25,000 fine; Securities America, which will pay $778,400 in restitution and a $150,000 fine; and Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp., which will pay $503,940 in restitution and a $100,000 fine.
“Our investigation into the sales of REITs, triggered by investor complaints, showed a pattern of impropriety in the sales of these popular but risky investments on the part of independent brokerage firms where supervision has historically been difficult to maintain,” Galvin (right) said in a statement.
In addition to these settlements, Galvin said that LPL Financial had completed the second round of its restitution in connection to similar violations settled with the securities division in December.
With the additional amount of $2,592,150.87 from LPL, total restitution retrieved for investors in Massachusetts this year from improper REIT sales now totals more than $11 million, and fines total more than $1.4 million.
“The independent firms must spend as much manpower and resources on compliance and supervision as they do on growth and revenue if regulators are to consider this model a truly viable option for investors,” Galvin said. “The willingness of the five settling firms to correct this problem today is a small step in the right direction.”
The REIT investigation, conducted by the securities division’s enforcement section, revealed “significant and widespread problems” with the firms’ compliance with their own policies, practices and procedures rules, as well as adherence with Massachusetts prospectus requirements, which left “investors often trapped in illiquid and underperforming financial products.”
The Massachusetts securities division noted that because REITs have become a popular investment, but present risks to investors, the state has imposed a rule that an investor’s purchase of these instruments can be no more than 10% of their liquid net worth.
More on AdvisorOne: