More On Legal & Compliancefrom The Advisor's Professional Library
- The Custody Rule and its Ramifications When an RIA takes custody of a clients funds or securities, risk to that individual increases dramatically. Rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment Advisers Act (better known as the Custody Rule), was passed to protect clients from unscrupulous investors.
- Client Commission Practices and Soft Dollars RIAs should always evaluate whether the products and services they receive from broker-dealers are appropriate. The SEC suggested that an RIAs failure to stay within the scope of the Section 28(e) safe harbor may violate the advisors fiduciary duty to clients, so RIAs must evaluate their soft dollar relationships on a regular basis to ensure they are disclosed properly and that they do not negatively impact the best execution of clients transactions.
After complaints, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority on Wednesday withdrew its proposed rule that would have required advisory firms to include a reference and a link to BrokerCheck on their websites.
FINRA had asked the Securities and Exchange Commission last September to approve further amendments to BrokerCheck that would have required advisors to include a BrokerCheck website link.
A FINRA spokesperson told AdvisorOne that FINRA withdrew the filing “in order to give further consideration to the comments received in response to the SEC’s publication of the proposed rule change,” and that FINRA plans to refile its proposal.
David Bellaire, executive vice president and general counsel for the Financial Services Institute, told AdvisorOne on Wednesday that FINRA’s proposal, in its current form, was “unworkable.”
Jonathan Henschen, president of the broker-dealer recruiting firm Henschen & Associates, says that "having BrokerCheck links on social media is unnecessary and extreme, perpetuating suspicion of representatives when it is not warranted."
In September, FINRA asked the SEC to amend FINRA Rule 2267, in an attempt to “to facilitate and increase investor use of BrokerCheck information,” by requiring member firms to include a reference and a link to BrokerCheck on their websites and on certain websites maintained by, or on behalf of, any person associated with a member firm.
In other words, advisors would have to include a reference and link to BrokerCheck on their websites “or any other comparable Internet presence,” Bellaire told AdvisorOne on Wednesday. “By extension, that would include social media accounts and potentially apply to some of the websites that act as aggregrators of advisors’ biographical information.”
The bottom line, says Bellaire, is that “FINRA’s proposed rule did not provide the specificity and clarity that advisors would need to properly assess their compliance efforts.” What’s more, he said, “We also believed the issue would grow in complexity over time, as more Web technology was created and put to use.”
For instance, with LinkedIn, advisors would not be able to share multiple website links on their profile page, Bellaire says, while on Twitter, there is a limited number of characters (160) in the personal description section, which would not be enough for the required BrokerCheck disclosures.
FINRA’s proposal “could be done in a more limited fashion,” Bellaire says, and “we welcome the opportunity to help FINRA find a workable solution.”
Read FINRA Seeks to Require Members to Link to BrokerCheck on AdvisorOne.