Fund Industry Challenges CFTC Registration

‘It is still very unclear what, if any, benefits there will be to shareholders from having funds register with the CFTC,’ says fund advocate

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Dealings With Qualified Clients and Accredited Investors Depending upon an RIAs business model and investment strategies, it may be important to identify “qualified clients” and “accredited investors.”  The Dodd-Frank Act authorized the SEC to change which clients are defined by those terms.
  • Client Commission Practices and Soft Dollars RIAs should always evaluate whether the products and services they receive from broker-dealers are appropriate. The SEC suggested that an RIA’s failure to stay within the scope of the Section 28(e) safe harbor may violate the advisor’s fiduciary duty to clients, so RIAs must evaluate their soft dollar relationships on a regular basis to ensure they are disclosed properly and that they do not negatively impact the best execution of clients’ transactions.

The mutual fund industry and former Securities and Exchange Commission officials are fighting back over a rule adopted by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission that will force many mutual funds to register with the CFTC.

The Mutual Fund Directors Forum, the independent membership forum for fund directors, is the latest group to join in the fight along with the Investment Company Institute, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce as well as former SEC commissioners and senior officials at the agency.

On Thursday, the Mutual Fund Directors Forum filed a “friend of the court” brief with the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, supporting a challenge brought by ICI and the Chamber of Commerce.

Joining in the Forum’s brief were former SEC Chairman Richard Breeden, former Commissioners Paul Atkins, Ed Fleischman and Joe Grundfest, and former directors of the SEC’s Division of Investment Management Allan Mostoff, Paul Roye and Marianne Smythe.

The brief argues that the CFTC failed to account for and justify the impact that its rule change would have on shareholders of mutual funds. The brief notes that the CFTC failed to adequately quantify the increased costs that would result from funds being dually registered with the SEC and CFTC and did not show how shareholders would benefit from the new rule.

“It is still very unclear what, if any, benefits there will be to shareholders from having funds register with the CFTC,” said Susan Ferris Wyderko, president & CEO of the Mutual Fund Directors Forum, in a statement. “Investors will bear additional costs without offsetting benefits, and will be harmed when the number of risk management strategies offered by mutual funds is inevitably reduced as a result of funds trying to avoid triggering the burdens of dual registration.”

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.