SEC Ends Investigation of Buffett’s Former Top Aide

The SEC decided not to take action against David Sokol, Buffett’s former potential successor, for possible insider trading

David Sokol. (Photo: AP) David Sokol. (Photo: AP)

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • RIAs and Customer Identification Just as RIAs owe a duty to diligently protect their clients’ privacy and guard against theft, firms also play a vital role in customer identification. Although RIAs are not subject to an anti-money laundering rule, securities regulators expect advisors to address these issues in their policies and procedures.
  • Differences Between State and SEC Regulation of Investment Advisors States may impose licensing or registration requirements on IARs doing business in their jurisdiction, even if the IAR works for an SEC-registered firm.  States may investigate and prosecute fraud by any IAR in their jurisdiction, even if the individual works for an SEC-registered firm.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has finished its investigation of Warren Buffett’s possible successor, David Sokol, regarding possible insider trading.

The Wall Street Journal reported Jan. 3 that the SEC has decided “not to take action,” according to Sokol’s attorney.

SEC spokesman John Nester declined to provide a comment on the matter to AdvisorOne, stating that any letter to terminate an investigation is not a public document.

The Journal reported that Barry Wm. Levine, Sokol’s lawyer, said he was informed on Jan. 3 that the SEC had wrapped up its investigation and decided not to take action.

“There has been a thorough legal analysis and factual scrutiny and the SEC has concluded, as we have always maintained, that David Sokol never did anything wrong," Levine told The Journal.

While Buffett has named his son Howard as his possible successor as chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, Sokol, Buffett’s former No. 2 at the company, was also considered a possible successor until it was discovered that he had bought millions of dollars in stock in Lubrizol Corp. before suggesting Buffett, the Berkshire CEO, buy the chemical company.

Sokol abruptly resigned in March 2011 after that news came to light.

As The Journal reports, at issue in the SEC investigation was Sokol's purchase of about $10 million worth of shares of Lubrizol, a stake that rose in value by about $3 million when Berkshire bought the company.

According to The Journal, Sokol first bought shares of Lubrizol in December 2010 and January 2011 after discussing the company with investment bankers. He subsequently recommended that Buffett buy the chemicals firm. Two months later, in March, Berkshire said it would acquire Lubrizol for $9 billion.

A 2011 report by the audit committee of Berkshire’s board concluded Sokol had misled Buffett about how he first heard about Lubrizol, The Journal says.

The SEC began investigating the investment shortly after Sokol resigned from Berkshire. Says The Journal report: “Buffett said at the time that Berkshire had turned over ‘very damning evidence’ about the purchases to the SEC.”

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.