UBS to Pay $1 Billion for Libor Manipulation

Fine would be more than double the record penalty paid by Barclays, which settled in June by paying $450 million

UBS' headqurters in Zurich, Switzerland. (Photo: AP) UBS' headqurters in Zurich, Switzerland. (Photo: AP)

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Client Commission Practices and Soft Dollars RIAs should always evaluate whether the products and services they receive from broker-dealers are appropriate. The SEC suggested that an RIA’s failure to stay within the scope of the Section 28(e) safe harbor may violate the advisor’s fiduciary duty to clients, so RIAs must evaluate their soft dollar relationships on a regular basis to ensure they are disclosed properly and that they do not negatively impact the best execution of clients’ transactions.
  • Best Practices for Working with Senior Investors Securities examiners deal harshly with RIAs that do not fulfill their fiduciary obligations toward senior investors, as the SEC and state securities regulators view older investors as particularly vulnerable and in need of protection.

Libor manipulation is rearing its ugly head again. In the latest infraction, UBS will pay $1 billion to settle allegations that it manipulated Libor, according to various reports.

The Financial Times and other publications reported Thursday that the news about UBS’ settlement will likely be made public on Monday.

As it stands now, “up to 10 authorities around the world are investigating potential manipulation of the rate in a probe that has embroiled around 20 banks and interdealer brokers,” the Financial Times reported. “The first arrests in the investigation were made this week by the U.K. authorities. One of the arrested men, Tom Hayes, used to work for UBS.”

UBS’ settlement is expected to involve four regulators, the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the U.K. Financial Services Authority and the Swiss regulator FINMA, which is UBS’ primary supervisor, according to the Financial Times.

All four are expected to receive some sort of monetary settlement–although FINMA cannot extract fines, it can demand that companies give up ill-gotten gains, the Times reported.

A fine in excess of $1 billion would be more than double the record penalty paid by Barclays, which settled the authorities’ Libor investigation in June by paying $450 million, the Times said.

The Financial Times reported that UBS “also won partial immunity from regulators by coming with information. The Swiss bank was one of the first to launch an internal investigation into the matter after authorities requested information in 2009.”

The UBS settlement will shed a light on the “alleged manipulation of the yen-denominated Libor interest rate in particular,” people close to the situation told the Times.

A $1 billion fine would cap a year that has seen UBS’ compliance issues put under public scrutiny, including a rogue-trading incident that lost the bank $2.3 billion, the Financial Times reported. “The bank was fined nearly £30m last month by the FSA over the incident, while the trader at the heart of the scandal, Kweku Adoboli, was sentenced to seven years in prison for perpetrating the biggest bank fraud in British history.”

Reprints Discuss this story