What Constitutes High-Quality Money Management?

In the school of money management, there are a number of different approaches. Most believe managing a portfolio consists of some percentage art and some percentage science.

I suppose the science part could be relegated to a computer model. However, the portion of portfolio management which is dedicated to "art" requires a human being. Off the top of my head, I can think of at least one ETF and one mutual fund that discounted the "art" portion and relied solely on a computer model to make all decisions. In these cases, I learned a valuable lesson: you cannot and should not discount the human element. In each case, there were significant periods of underperformance. Hence, I believe that a good quality money management approach requires some degree of art and science. Then comes diversification. 

Diversification

Can a portfolio be too diversified? I used to think not. But today, I believe the answer is yes. Consider this. Investment A (the S&P 500 Index) and Investment B (S&P 500 Bear Market Fund) react exactly opposite to each other. In essence, they are perfectly negatively correlated. Therefore, as A rises, B falls, and vice versa. At the end of a specific period, your portfolio essentially has a zero return. This is because they cancel each other out. To correct this, you would have to select two investments with positive returns over the exact same period. Assume C and D both have an average three-year return of, say, 8.0%. In this case, the portfolio would have a positive return, but it would be impossible for these investments to have a correlation of negative one. 

A few years ago, I wrote about a subscription I had with a piece of software called GSphere. This program provided a mathematical measure of a portfolio's diversification, which is a great idea in theory. Certainly, you would want to be very diversified during a bear market. However, the more diversified you are when markets are rising, the weaker your returns will be. For example, this program would score the portfolio from 0% to 100%. A portfolio with a diversification score of 100% would be the most diversified, and of course, the safest. However, a 100% score exists mostly in the classroom. In reality, a score of 55% is considered to be very well diversified. 

Conclusion

I still believe diversification is important. Today, I select good-quality funds with strong three- and five-year track records, and it's important that they don't move in lock step. If they did, then your diversification score would be very low. Of course, this wouldn't be a problem during a bull market. 

And so the subject of portfolio management continues.

Reprints Discuss this story
We welcome your thoughts. Please allow time for your contribution to be approved and posted. Thank you.

Most Recent Videos

Video Library ››