More On Legal & Compliancefrom The Advisor's Professional Library
- The Custody Rule and its Ramifications When an RIA takes custody of a clients funds or securities, risk to that individual increases dramatically. Rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment Advisers Act (better known as the Custody Rule), was passed to protect clients from unscrupulous investors.
- RIAs and Customer Identification Just as RIAs owe a duty to diligently protect their clients privacy and guard against theft, firms also play a vital role in customer identification. Although RIAs are not subject to an anti-money laundering rule, securities regulators expect advisors to address these issues in their policies and procedures.
Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings are in an unusual position. Several of their representatives may be made to stand trial in Italy as prosecutors look into allegations of market manipulation and abuse of privileged information. Similar charges against Moody’s, however, which had also been a target of the investigation, have been dropped.
Reuters reported Monday that prosecutors from the southern Italian town of Trani are pursuing the action after a series of cuts in Italy’s credit ratings was made by the agencies since the spring of 2011. Five representatives from S&P and two from Fitch could find themselves on trial in the Mediterranean nation.
A court will decide whether the case will proceed. Italian police issued a statement saying that two officials from Moody’s are no longer in jeopardy of trial, since prosecutors have dropped charges against them.
Prosecutors allege that reports by both S&P and Fitch on Italy and its banking system were leaked during business hours in at least one instance. The leak is alleged to have caused the Milan stock market to record heavy losses.
Two consumer rights groups initiated the case by filing complaints last year, and Italian authorities began their investigation into the ratings downgrades.
Ratings agencies are already suffering from somewhat tarnished reputations for their failure to foresee the mortgage meltdown in 2008-2009. Should the case come to trial, arguments on both sides concerning the liability of the agencies during a period of worldwide economic turmoil will come to the fore, and the prominence of their position could be challenged.
European policymakers have already been publicly critical of the agencies’ actions in downgrading eurozone countries with heavy debt loads. They said that the agencies moved too quickly to cut ratings even as nations enacted severe fiscal policies to rein in debt and the European Union issued bailouts in efforts to combat the debt crisis in the eurozone.