More On Legal & Compliancefrom The Advisor's Professional Library
- The Custody Rule and its Ramifications When an RIA takes custody of a clients funds or securities, risk to that individual increases dramatically. Rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment Advisers Act (better known as the Custody Rule), was passed to protect clients from unscrupulous investors.
- Risk-Based Oversight of Investment Advisors Even if the SEC had a larger budget and more resources, it is doubtful that the Commission would have the resources to regularly examine all RIAs. Therefore, the SEC is likely to continue relying on risk-based oversight to fulfill its mission of protecting investors.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published a rule Wednesday that will allow the agency to federally supervise the larger consumer debt collectors. The bureau also released a field guide that examiners will use to ensure that companies and banks engaging in debt collection are following the law.
The CFPB’s supervision authority over these entities will begin when the rule takes effect on Jan. 2, 2013. Under the rule, any firm that has more than $10 million in annual receipts from consumer debt collection activities will be subject to the CFPB’s supervisory authority. The CFPB says this authority will extend to about 175 debt collectors, which account for more than 60% of the industry’s annual receipts in the consumer debt collection market.
CFPB Director Richard Cordray said in a statement that “millions of consumers are affected by debt collection, and we want to make sure they are treated fairly.” By supervising the larger debt collectors for the first time at the federal level, he said, “we want all companies to realize that the better business choice is to follow the law—not break it.”
Approximately 30 million Americans have, on average, $1,500 of debt subject to collection, CFPB says. “Debt collectors often report consumers’ collection status to the credit bureaus. If they get the information wrong, this can be the difference between getting approved or denied for such financial products as a mortgage or a car loan.”
The consumer debt collection market covered by the rule includes three main types of debt collection: Firms that may buy defaulted debt and collect the proceeds for themselves; Firms that may collect defaulted debt owned by another company in return for a fee; and debt collection attorneys that collect through litigation.
A single company may be involved in any or all of these activities, the CFPB says. “By expanding the supervision program to oversee the nonbanks that are larger participants in the consumer debt collection market, the bureau will now have a window into every stage of the process, from the origination of credit to debt collection,” CFPB said.
Pursuant to the CFPB’s supervision authority, examiners will be assessing potential risks to consumers and whether debt collectors are complying with requirements of federal consumer financial law. Among other things, examiners will be evaluating whether debt collectors:
- Provide Required Disclosures: Examiners will evaluate whether debt collectors are properly identifying themselves and properly disclosing the amount of debt owed. The CFPB intends to ensure that debt collectors are upfront and clear with consumers.
- Provide Accurate Information: Examiners will assess whether debt collectors are using accurate data in their pursuit of debt. Inaccurate information can lead to collectors attempting to collect debt that consumers do not owe or have already paid.
- Have a Consumer Complaint and Dispute Resolution Process: As part of the CFPB’s compliance management review, examiners will assess whether complaints are resolved adequately and in a timely manner, whether the complaints highlight violations of federal consumer financial law, and whether the debt collector has a process in place to address consumer disputes.
- Communicate Civilly and Honestly with Consumers: Examiners will be assessing whether debt collectors have harassed or deceived consumers in pursuit of debt. For example, debt collectors should not be using obscene or profane language with consumers. Nor should they be engaging the consumer in telephone conversations repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass. Debt collectors cannot threaten to imprison consumers who do not pay their debt or threaten to tell the consumer’s employer about the debt.