Standard Chartered CEO Comes to New York

Will attend Lawsky hearing ‘if appropriate’

Standard Chartered headquarters in London. (Photo: AP) Standard Chartered headquarters in London. (Photo: AP)

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Client Communication and Miscommunication RIA policies and procedures must specify what type of communications should be retained. The safest course of action is for RIAs to retain all communications—to clients, from clients, and about client accounts.  To comply with fiduciary obligations, communications must be thorough and not mislead.
  • The Custody Rule and its Ramifications When an RIA takes custody of a client’s funds or securities, risk to that individual increases dramatically. Rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment Advisers Act (better known as the Custody Rule), was passed to protect clients from unscrupulous investors.

Peter Sands, the CEO of Standard Chartered, is in New York and is prepared to attend a hearing ordered by Benjamin Lawsky, head of the state’s Department of Financial Services (DFS), on whether the bank should lose its charter to operate there based on charges that it flouted anti-money-laundering regulations. While the bank said he came to work with company lawyers, not to attend the hearing, it added that he will do so “if appropriate.”

Bloomberg reported Tuesday that Sands, who has disputed the amount of transactions cited by Lawsky as violating regulations, was reported by the Telegraph to have come specifically to answer charges and negotiate a settlement. However, New York-based bank spokeswoman Julie Gibson said in the report that Sands has been in the state for “a couple days,” and added, “If there is a hearing on Wednesday, he will participate in that.”

Melissa Cheah, a Singapore-based spokeswoman for the bank, was quoted saying, “He hasn’t gone personally to negotiate with regulators or specifically to attend the meeting. He is willing to do so if appropriate.”

The order for the hearing alleged that StanChart, as it is popularly known, helped to launder about $250 billion in Iranian funds over the course of 60,000 wire transfers that were set up not to disclose the presence of Iranian institutions in the process. The bank claims the amount is far smaller, less than $14 million.

Moody’s Investors Service said Monday that just the reputational damage from the DFS charges is credit negative.

Lawsky, as the top banking regulator in the state, is empowered to pull the bank’s license to operate in New York, based on his department’s charter. That could cost the bank 40% of its earnings, according to Chirantan Barua, an analyst at Sanford Bernstein Research in London.

The bank has already agreed to hire an outside monitor that will supervise the bank’s compliance with anti-money-laundering laws, and Lawsky is reportedly considering a settlement amounting to as much as $700 million. Last month HSBC Holdings put that much aside against a settlement on similar allegations.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.