More On Legal & Compliancefrom The Advisor's Professional Library
- The Custody Rule and its Ramifications When an RIA takes custody of a clients funds or securities, risk to that individual increases dramatically. Rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment Advisers Act (better known as the Custody Rule), was passed to protect clients from unscrupulous investors.
- Risk-Based Oversight of Investment Advisors Even if the SEC had a larger budget and more resources, it is doubtful that the Commission would have the resources to regularly examine all RIAs. Therefore, the SEC is likely to continue relying on risk-based oversight to fulfill its mission of protecting investors.
BrokersXpress, the specialty broker-dealer owned by Schwab under OptionsXpress Holdings, reportedly told advisors and clients Wednesday that it will shut its doors. Schwab purchased the options-based businesses in March 2011 for a reported $1 billion.
“We acquired OptionsXpress to gain access to a retail derivatives product offering,” Schwab spokesman Susan Forman told AdvisorOne. “As part of that deal, we also gained BrokersXpress. What we’ve found is that it was difficult to integrate because BrokersXpress does not meet our core business needs.”
As such, Forman said it is winding down BrokersXpress with the requisite 90-day notification process for affiliated advisors and clients. CEO Barry Metzger will remain with OptionsXpress, as will most of the staff of BrokersXpress, she added.
OptionsXpress has been the subject of two separate investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission recently, in which charges were filed. Forman emphatically stated that the decision to close BrokersXpress has nothing to do with either case.
In the first case, the SEC charged the firm, as well as four officials at the firm and a customer, in an alleged abusive naked short-selling scheme.
The SEC’s Division of Enforcement claims the Chicago-based firm “failed to satisfy its close-out obligations under Regulation SHO by repeatedly engaging in a series of sham ‘reset’ transactions designed to give the illusion that the firm had purchased securities of like kind and quantity.”
The firm and a customer, Jonathan Feldman, engaged in these “sham reset transactions in a number of securities, resulting in continuous failures to deliver,” according to the SEC’s complaint.
In the second case, the SEC accused the firm’s trading arm, OX Trading LLC, with continuing its trading operations after delisting from the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) and deregistering with the SEC, apparently to avoid an audit.
The SEC’s Division of Enforcement alleges OX Trading, under the direction of former OptionsXpress CFO Thomas Stern, operated as an unregistered dealer from October 2009 to November 2010 and illegally transacted in securities while not a member of a national securities association or national exchange.
Schwab's outside counsel, Stephen Senderowitz of the law frim Winston & Strawn LLP, said of the second matter that OX Trading "was closed in anticipation of the implementation of the Volcker rule."
In a statement to AdvisorOne, he also pointed out that OptionsXpress fired Stern after an investigation. "The allegations against Mr. Stern relating to his post-registration conduct that are contained in the order were self-reported by the company," Senderowitz said in the statement.