FINRA Board Member Resigns After Suspension

Joel Blumenschein charged by FINRA with failing to supervise a broker

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • The New and Improved Form ADV Whether an RIA is describing its investment strategy in advertisements or in the new Form ADV Part 2, it is important the firm articulates material risks faced by advisory clients and avoids language that might be construed as a guarantee.
  • Client Commission Practices and Soft Dollars RIAs should always evaluate whether the products and services they receive from broker-dealers are appropriate. The SEC suggested that an RIA’s failure to stay within the scope of the Section 28(e) safe harbor may violate the advisor’s fiduciary duty to clients, so RIAs must evaluate their soft dollar relationships on a regular basis to ensure they are disclosed properly and that they do not negatively impact the best execution of clients’ transactions.

FINRA board member Joel Blumenschein has resigned as he was recently fined $30,000 and suspended by FINRA for allegedly failing to supervise one of his company’s brokers, Gary Gossett.

The complaint against Blumenschein, president of Freedom Investors, claimed that Gossett made “a series of unsuitable penny stock trades in the retirement account of a customer of limited means” without the customer’s permission.

FINRA described Freedom Investors' oversight system as “so inadequate that Blumenschein was unable to provide a consistent or coherent description of it.” FINRA also claimed in the settlement that “his testimony, under oath, was at times both evasive and contradictory, thus highlighting the system's inadequacies.”

Tracy Stoneman of Stoneman Law Firm in Westcliffe, Colo., said in a statement that she has long felt that FINRA and its predecessor, the National Association of Securities Dealers, have been “soft" on their members. She penned a book in 2002 titled “Brokerage Fraud: What Wall Street Doesn't Want you to Know,” in which she criticized the regulators for being incapable of properly supervising their own members because of the “conflict in not wanting to bite the hand that feeds it.”

Stoneman, who’s about to write another book that she says will “have even harsher criticism of the regulators,” said that the recent FINRA board member sanction is a perfect example of a serious problem in the upper ranks of FINRA “when board members participate in the same wrongful activity that FINRA is charged with supervising.”

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.