April 27, 2012

Sen. McCaskill to EBSA: Reopen Fiduciary Dialogue

McCaskill says EBSA and the industry can 'design an informative but achievable data request'

Sen McCaskill, D-Mo., at hearing in Congress in November. (Photo: AP) Sen McCaskill, D-Mo., at hearing in Congress in November. (Photo: AP)

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Differences Between State and SEC Regulation of Investment Advisors States may impose licensing or registration requirements on IARs doing business in their jurisdiction, even if the IAR works for an SEC-registered firm.  States may investigate and prosecute fraud by any IAR in their jurisdiction, even if the individual works for an SEC-registered firm.
  • Do’s and Don’ts of Advisory Contracts In preparation for a compliance exam, securities regulators typically will ask to see copies of an RIAs advisory agreements. An RIA must be able to produce requested contracts and the contracts must comply with applicable SEC or state rules.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., is pressing the Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) to re-open the dialogue EBSA started with industry trade groups regarding its data request on its fiduciary re-proposal so that both parties can “design an informative but achievable data request.”

“While I am glad that EBSA is seeking hard data to inform its rulemaking, I am worried that the EBSA and the industry do not seem to have a constructive relationship,” McCaskill told EBSA head Phyllis Borzi in a April 23 letter.

McCaskill told Borzi that industry trade groups have told her that EBSA has “rebuffed their offers for a continued dialogue.” The stakeholders, she told Borzi, have “confirmed that they are ready to work with the EBSA to design information request to provide data that will meet the EBSA’s needs without unjustifiable cost of undue administrative burden,” McCaskill wrote.

Phyllis BorziAn EBSA spokerperson told AdvisorOne that Borzi (left) has received the McCaskill letter and that EBSA “will be responding” to the Senator. However, the spokesperson would not comment on whether EBSA had rebuffed industry groups’ attempts to re-open the dialogue.

EBSA has been disappointed that industry trade groups could not provide more data by its Feb. 24 deadline to fulfill the department’s request regarding what impact the conflicts of interest faced by brokers and advisors who advise on IRAs have on IRA investors.

When EBSA released its original rule proposal on fiduciary duty under ERISA in October 2010, EBSA received comments suggesting that it had not adequately demonstrated or quantified the harm that can arise when investment advisors’ interests conflict with those of the IRA owners they advise.

In response to the comments, EBSA began examining a wide array of evidence and developing a robust economic analysis, and sent out two data requests: one issued on Dec. 16 for the data underlying the Oliver Wyman report; and the second was a request from EBSA’s Office of Policy Research on Dec. 15 that industry trade groups voluntarily assist EBSA in its expanded “regulatory impact analysis” to assess the impact of the department’s reproposed fiduciary rule on ERISA plans and IRAs. That data request was due to EBSA by Feb. 24.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.