Berthel Fisher Wins Arbitration in Real Estate Case

Claims by accredited investors against broker-dealer in TIC case dismissed by FINRA panel

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • The New and Improved Form ADV Whether an RIA is describing its investment strategy in advertisements or in the new Form ADV Part 2, it is important the firm articulates material risks faced by advisory clients and avoids language that might be construed as a guarantee.
  • Dealings With Qualified Clients and Accredited Investors Depending upon an RIAs business model and investment strategies, it may be important to identify “qualified clients” and “accredited investors.”  The Dodd-Frank Act authorized the SEC to change which clients are defined by those terms.

Claims by three accredited investors against broker-dealer Berthel Fisher & Co. Financial Services, of Marion, Iowa, were dismissed by a FINRA arbitration panel on April 9 after five weeks of proceedings that stretched out over several months.

The claims were filed in connection with the purchase of tenancy in common (TIC) interests that investors who filed the claims alleged were valueless because they were “a massive fraudulent investment scheme managed by” the respondents in the case, which included not only Berthel Fisher but also Ameriprise Financial Services. The investors sought the rescission of their investments and return of their money.

Hearings began in August, but were interrupted and then resumed in February, concluding in March. After testimony that, according to the broker-dealer, “included hundreds of exhibits, testimony from industry experts and more than fifteen fact witnesses,” arbitrators dismissed investor claims against Berthel Fisher. Ameriprise Financial Services did not participate, as it is not a member of FINRA, and no claims were adjudicated against it, according to the arbitration award.

When asked by AdvisorOne about the investors’ claim that the TIC interests were valueless, Rick Murphy, president of Berthel Fisher, said, “We don’t believe so. The building is still there; they [the investors] still own it; it’s still fully occupied.”

While he said that the value of One Southwest Crossing, a class A office building of more than 200,000 square feet in Eden Prairie, Minn., may have gone down when the real estate market crashed, he added that the company tells its investors that it cannot control what the real estate market does.

Murphy said, “We believe, and I believe SEC and FINRA believe, that tenant in common securities are securities under the Act [the Securities Act of 1933]. But it is direct ownership of real estate.” He added that the company believed Berthel Fisher complied with requirements for due diligence regarding such securities, both as required by FINRA and under the Act, “and the arbitration panel obviously felt we had done so as well.”

Reprints Discuss this story

Most Recent Videos

Video Library ››