August 29, 2011

SRO Bill Likely to Follow Sept. 13 House Hearing

Regulation of investment advisors and broker-dealers also on agenda in wake of Dodd-Frank

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • The New and Improved Form ADV Whether an RIA is describing its investment strategy in advertisements or in the new Form ADV Part 2, it is important the firm articulates material risks faced by advisory clients and avoids language that might be construed as a guarantee.
  • Best Practices for Working with Senior Investors Securities examiners deal harshly with RIAs that do not fulfill their fiduciary obligations toward senior investors, as the SEC and state securities regulators view older investors as particularly vulnerable and in need of protection.

capitol rotundaWashington insiders are betting that the House Financial Services Committee will introduce legislation calling for a self-regulatory organization (SRO) for advisors soon after the committee's subcommittee on capital markets holds a Sept. 13 hearing on the issue.

"It's very likely we can expect SRO legislation to be introduced shortly after [the hearing] on the House side," says Duane Thompson, senior policy analyst for fi360. "If an SRO bill is introduced in connection with the hearing," Thompson says, "the first question is whether it will be limited to broker-dealers/advisors, or include independent advisors as well." The second, more important, question, he continues, "is not whether it will be passed by the House, but whether the Senate will take it up this year." 

The Sept. 13 hearing will also examine the regulation of investment advisors and broker-dealers, while the full committee plans to hold a hearing on Sept. 15 on the need to reform the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

rep. scott garrettThe capital markets subcommittee, chaired by Rep. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., (left) will examine the studies mandated by Dodd-Frank on the effectiveness of standards of care applicable to broker-dealers and investment advisors, and on the need for enhanced examination and enforcement resources for advisors—i.e. the need for a self-regulatory organization (SRO) for advisors.

Garrett has also introduced the SEC Regulatory Accountability Act (H.R. 2308), which would require the Securities and Exchange Commission to perform enhanced cost/benefit analyses on its rules.

The full committee’s chairman, Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., is also pushing legislation called the SEC Modernization Act, which would significantly alter the SEC’s structure. The full committee postponed a hearing it was to hold in early August regarding the SEC called “Fixing the Watchdog.” That hearing has now been rescheduled to Sept. 15, and will focus on the structure and operations of the SEC.

It remains to be seen if lawmakers will delve into the fiduciary duty rule being crafted by the SEC at the hearings. But Bachus told SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro in an early August letter that the agency should hold off on writing a rule to put brokers under a fiduciary mandate, as he supports the views aired by the SEC's two Republican commissioners, Troy Paredes and former commissioner Kathleen Casey, that the commission has failed to “demonstrate that investors are being harmed by the current” fiduciary standard and that “harmonization” of advisor and broker rules would “enhance” investor protection.

The SEC should not be pressing ahead on the fiduciary issue, Bachus said, because it has yet to provide Congress with “empirical data and economic analysis to justify” fiduciary or harmonization rules. Any action taken on these two fronts, Bachus said, “is premature” until the SEC answers these questions.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.