Majority Leader Cantor Denies Debt-Ceiling Conflict Over Investment

Spokesman for Eric Cantor tells AdvisorOne that Congressman strongly denies HuffPo charge that his portfolio would benefit from U.S. government default.

Rep. Eric Cantor (left) watching as Rep. Raul Ryan spoke outside the White House in early June. (Photo: AP) Rep. Eric Cantor (left) watching as Rep. Raul Ryan spoke outside the White House in early June. (Photo: AP)

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Compliance Exam There is much more to compliance examination survival than knowing all of the rules. It helps to understand why the rules were put in place—and to recognize that examiners are not the enemy.
  • The New and Improved Form ADV Whether an RIA is describing its investment strategy in advertisements or in the new Form ADV Part 2, it is important the firm articulates material risks faced by advisory clients and avoids language that might be construed as a guarantee.

Is Eric Cantor the next Bond villain? As talks over the debt ceiling in Washington continue to sputter, the Huffington Post, the left-leaning website run by Washington insider Arianna Huffington, reports Democrats are accusing Rep. Cantor, R-Va., of a conflict of interest related to negotiations over the country’s debt ceiling, claiming he could profit from the country’s default.

The controversy stems from a June 17 Wall Street Journal article that reported the House majority leader “bought $15,000 in shares of ProShares Trust Ultrashort 20+ Year Treasury ETF (TBT) last December, according to his 2009 financial disclosure statement.”

The Journal notes that the exchange-traded fund “takes a short position in long-dated government bonds. In effect, it is a bet against U.S. government bonds—and perhaps on inflation in the future.”

Cantor spokesman Brad Dayspring told AdvisorOne that Cantor stands to lose much more if the government defaults, in part because of his investments in the Thrift Savings Plan portion of his congressional pension. The value of his investment in the ProShares fund is just 1% that of the value of his investment in the G Fund of government bonds, which would decrease significantly if the government defaults.

"The insinuation is so outrageous that it shows a fundamental lack of understanding about how the markets work, how the U.S. economy works,” Dayspring says. “For the conspiracy theorists—they would have to believe that Eric would want to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars to make a few thousands in return.”

A draft of a resolution circulated by House Democrats and obtained by HuffPo claims that Cantor "stands to profit from U.S. treasury default, which thereby raises the appearance of a conflict of interest," and that he "may be sabotaging [debt ceiling] negotiations for his own personal gain."

"Majority Leader Cantor has compromised the dignity and integrity of the Members of the House by raising the appearance of a conflict of interest in negotiations with the executive branch over raising the debt ceiling," the resolution adds.

But Cantor’s spokesman again denied any such compromise. “Putting aside the lunacy of it all, he [Cantor] would lose hundreds of thousands of dollars if he did what they suggest,” Dayspring added. “Any member of Congress who would seriously identify themselves with this ridiculous resolution reveals a complete inability to understand diversification and basic investing."

ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses that correspond to twice (200%) the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Bond Index, according the company’s website.

The fund lost 12.10% year-to-date, with one-year return of -11.98% and a three-year return of -51.04%.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.