Scott Garrett, House Financial Services Subcommittee: The Extended 2011 IA 25 Profile

Garrett’s goals are clear: roll back Dodd-Frank, deny the SEC a funding increase, dismantle Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and slow down fiduciary duty rulemaking

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • RIAs and Customer Identification Just as RIAs owe a duty to diligently protect their clients’ privacy and guard against theft, firms also play a vital role in customer identification. Although RIAs are not subject to an anti-money laundering rule, securities regulators expect advisors to address these issues in their policies and procedures.
  • Disaster Recovery Plans and Succession Planning RIAs owe a fiduciary duty to clients to prepare for disasters and other contingencies. If an RIA does not have a disaster recovery plan, clients’ financial well-being may be jeopardized.  RIAs should also engage in succession planning, ensuring a smooth transaction if an owner or principal leaves.   

This is an extended version of the profile that appeared in the May issue of Investment Advisor, part of AdvisorOne's Special Report profiling this year's members of the IA 25, the most influential people in and around the advisor universe. See the complete list and Special Report schedule for extended profiles of all the 2011 members of the IA 25.

Since taking the helm of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises in January, Rep. Scott Garrett’s goals have been clear: roll back Dodd-Frank, deny the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) a funding increase, dismantle Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and slow down the SEC’s fiduciary duty rulemaking.

Scott Garrett, R-N.J.The New Jersey Republican and his fellow Republicans on the subcommittee, as well as GOP members of the full Committee, told SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro in a recent letter that the SEC “lacked a clear basis” to move forward with a fiduciary duty rulemaking for brokers, and that a cost benefit analysis was needed before the agency should push ahead. (See Schapiro’s response to Garrett’s letter.)

Garrett has promised to hold a hearing soon to further review the SEC’s fiduciary duty rulemaking as well as the study mandated under Section 914 of Dodd-Frank, commonly referred to as the self-regulatory organization (SRO) study. “The oversight, examination and enforcement programs that different financial services providers are subject to must be considered concurrently” with a fiduciary duty for brokers, he argues.

Both the SEC and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Garrett has argued, have been able to deliver numerous studies and rules mandated under Dodd-Frank at their current funding levels, and that further compliance with Dodd-Frank should not equate to “spending more money.”

Garrett’s subcommittee will not only play a big role in how Dodd-Frank moves forward this year, but it will also be instrumental in attempting to privatize housing finance. GOP members of the full committee as well as Garrett’s subcommittee introduced eight pieces of legislation in late March to “wind down” mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

In early April, as the Capital Markets Subcommittee was in the process of marking up the eight bills, Garrett said that “this is only the beginning of this subcommittee’s work to continue to address the problems with the GSEs and help create a more sound and stable U.S. housing finance market going forward.” As the Treasury Department notes in a recent white paper, Garrett continued, “having the U.S. federal government underwrite 95% of the nation’s housing finance market is completely unsustainable and we must take actions now to attract private capital back to the market.” If Congress does nothing, Garrett continued, “as some suggest, then the government will continue to bear the burden of the entire nation’s housing market, adding further stress to the already overwhelmed federal budget balance sheet.”

Read more about the rest of the IA 25.

Don't see someone on this year's IA 25 that you think belongs there? Submit their name and your justification for why they should be considered among the most influential people in and around the advisor universe in the Comments field below. We promise to consider reader nominations, but please, no ad hominem attacks on those who were named in this or past years.--Ed.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.