More On Legal & Compliancefrom The Advisor's Professional Library
- RIAs and Customer Identification Just as RIAs owe a duty to diligently protect their clients privacy and guard against theft, firms also play a vital role in customer identification. Although RIAs are not subject to an anti-money laundering rule, securities regulators expect advisors to address these issues in their policies and procedures.
- Dealings With Qualified Clients and Accredited Investors Depending upon an RIAs business model and investment strategies, it may be important to identify “qualified clients” and “accredited investors.” The Dodd-Frank Act authorized the SEC to change which clients are defined by those terms.
The U.S. Senate is scheduled to hold a cloture vote beginning around 3:00 PM on Monday on the Obama-GOP compromise tax and unemployment insurance bill. The Democratic majority will very likely close debate on the bill with that Dec. 13 vote, and then approve the bill itself, likely on Dec. 14.
The bill, which would extend the Bush-era tax cuts for two more years and unemployment benefits (see details below), would still need to gain House approval before becoming law; passage there is expected to be more difficult, despite the Democratic majority in that chamber as well.
The compromise bill—The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010—was introduced into the Senate on Dec. 9 by Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and includes the following main provisions:
Extends Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) relief for two years.
Currently, a taxpayer receives an exemption of $33,750 (individuals) and $45,000 (married filing jointly) under the AMT. Current law also does not allow nonrefundable personal credits against the AMT. The Senate proposal increases the exemption amounts for 2010 to $47,450 (individuals) and $72,450 (married filing jointly) and for 2011 to $48,450 (individuals) and $74,450 (married filing jointly). The Senate proposal also allows the nonrefundable personal credits against the AMT. The proposal is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
Sets 35% Estate Tax.
The exemption would be set at $5 million per person and $10 million per couple and a top tax rate of 35% for the estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer taxes for two years, through 2012.
- Extends by two years the current tax rate for middle-income families.
- Includes a temporary $120 billion payroll tax reduction for workers.
- Extends unemployment insurance benefits for 13 months.
- Extends the American Opportunity Tax Credit (college tuition), the Child Tax Credit and the Earned Income Tax Credit for middle- and lower-income taxpayers.
- Allows businesses to deduct 100% of certain investments in the first year.
- Extends for two years the state and local sales tax deduction.
- Extends the capital gains and dividends rates through 2012.
On Friday, former President Bill Clinton and President Obama gave a joint press conference at the White House to tout the tax cut package. The Sunday talk shows were full of conversation about the package.
On Fox News Sunday, Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who will be the top Democrat on the new House Budget Committee in 2011, said that to many Democrats, the sticking point of the package arrived at by Obama and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) was the change to the estate tax. The proposed legislation would tax estates of more than $5 million at a rate of 35%; Democrats want a 45% tax rate on all estates valued at $3.5 million or higher. Rep. Paul Ryan, D-Wisc., who will take over the chairmanship of the House Budget Committee in January, implied that Republicans would let the deal die if Democrats tried to change it; he added that they would then return to the issue once they take office in January, when they will pass all the tax cuts and “do it retroactively.”
On Meet the Press, Austan Goolsbee, chairman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, defended the deal, but admitted that extending the Bush-era tax cuts for higher-income Americans constituted “a bitter pill to have to deal with.”