EU Sets Rules on Derivatives, Shorts, CDS

Commission seeks to stabilize markets

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Client Communication and Miscommunication RIA policies and procedures must specify what type of communications should be retained. The safest course of action is for RIAs to retain all communications—to clients, from clients, and about client accounts.  To comply with fiduciary obligations, communications must be thorough and not mislead.
  • Anti-Fraud Provisions of the Investment Advisers Act RIAs and IARs should view themselves as fiduciaries at all times, whether they meet the legal definition or not.  Deviating from the fiduciary standard of full disclosure while courting clients may cause the advisor significant problems.

In a bid to control the sort of trading that destabilized markets and put the euro in danger, the European Union proposed a series of rules governing such trades.

As reported in The New York Times on Wednesday, the proposed rulesare in line with those already put in place by the U.S., and are aimed at preventing economic destabilization in the wake of bank collapses.

Michel Barnier, commissioner for the European Union’s internal markets, said markets needed reassurance that Europe was using a single set of rules regarding short selling that would defend weaker economies.

France and Germany have blamed the selling of naked shorts for intensifying the economic problems of such countries as Portugal, Spain, and Greece; under the new rules, selling naked shorts could be restricted or even banned in some circumstances.

Rules were also proposed to provide more information about derivatives and their markets to both regulators and investors, particularly since derivatives “have a big impact on the real economy, from mortgages to food prices,” said Barnier. He also said that regulators should have access to similar information about bond market short positions and credit default swaps as well.

The rules concerning the sale of naked shorts arose out of Germany’s ban of the action in May. Regulators in other countries and at EU headquarters in Brussels were angered by the action, but in June Germany said that regulatory steps were moving too slowly and costing governments more money to meet obligations.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.