For Reform Bill, Senate Conferees Delay Response on Fiduciary

Senator Dodd said to be working on compromise with Senator Johnson

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Preventing and Dealing with Client Complaints Although the SEC has not provided specific guidance on how client complaints should be handled, a firm’s policies and procedures should provide clear direction how to do so, as neglecting complaints can exacerbate a bad situation.
  • Conducting Due Diligence of Sub-Advisors and Third-Party Advisors Engaging in due-diligence of sub-advisors isn’t just a recommended best practice— it is part of the fiduciary obligation to a client. An RIA should be extremely reluctant to enter a relationship with a sub-advisor who claims the firm’s strategy is proprietary.

The House and Senate conferees will resume their conference on Tuesday, June 22. Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Connecticut) has said that Senator Tim Johnson (D-South Dakota) is working on a compromise to the House's language calling for a fiduciary duty for brokers. Johnson drafted the original language calling for an SEC study of gaps in regulation for advisors and brokers, instead of imposing a fiduciary duty on brokers, as set out in the House bill.

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, who is chair of the conference committee, is reported as saying Wedneday during the conference process that he was optimistic a compromise position would emerge giving the SEC rulemaking authority on the fiduciary issue. One possibility is to use the Senate language calling for an SEC study, but at the end of the study to give the SEC the rulemaking authority to put brokers under a fiduciary standard. This is what SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro has been pressing for.

Frank said Wednesday during the conference debate that the House language specifically stated that "If there was no personalized advice, there's no [fiduciary] duty. If so, it ends the day that the advice was given." Frank added, "I cannot foresee [the House] giving in on fiduciary responsibility for individual investors."

House conferees also on Wednesday agreed to the language in the Senate bill that would approve self-funding for the SEC. But in a strange turn, Dodd and Senator Richard Durbin (D-Illinois), said they had serious concerns about the language. Frank, who was surprised by the Senators' position, was reported to have said that, "It was in their bill, now all of a sudden it's an open question." Dodd told the conference committee members on June 17 that "we've got some work to do before we can present a counter offer" on SEC funding.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.