From the September 2009 issue of Investment Advisor • Subscribe!

Alternative Uptick Rule

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Suitability and Fiduciary Duty Recommending suitable investments is more than just a regulatory obligation.  Many investors bring cases claiming lack of suitability, so RIAs must continuously put the onus on clients to notify the advisor of changes in their financial situation.  
  • Conducting Due Diligence of Sub-Advisors and Third-Party Advisors Engaging in due-diligence of sub-advisors isn’t just a recommended best practice— it is part of the fiduciary obligation to a client. An RIA should be extremely reluctant to enter a relationship with a sub-advisor who claims the firm’s strategy is proprietary.

The SEC announced August 17 that it is seeking public comment on an alternative approach to short selling price test restrictions that the Commission says "may be more effective and easier to implement than previously proposed price test restrictions currently under consideration."

The alternative uptick rule would allow short selling only at an increment above the national best bid. As a result, the Commission has reopened the comment period for 30 days--the original comment period for the proposals issued in April ended June 19--in order to receive input specifically on this alternative.

The SEC says it "particularly seeks comments on the alternative uptick rule as a permanent market-wide approach, as well as whether the alternative uptick rule should be combined with a circuit breaker approach."

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.