Federal Insurance Regulation?

House bill calls for letting insurers choose state or federal oversight

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Information This information sheet contains general information about certain provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and selected rules under the Adviser’s Act.  It also provides information about the resources available from the SEC to help advisors understand and comply with these laws and rules.
  • Anti-Fraud Provisions of the Investment Advisers Act RIAs and IARs should view themselves as fiduciaries at all times, whether they meet the legal definition or not.  Deviating from the fiduciary standard of full disclosure while courting clients may cause the advisor significant problems.

A bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on July 26 calling for the creation of an optional national regulator for the insurance industry. The House bill, which is companion legislation to The National Insurance Act of 2007 (S40), was introduced by Reps. Melissa Bean (D-Illinois) and Ed Royce (R-California). The bill would allow insurance companies and producers to choose whether to be regulated by the states or opt for a new, streamlined federal system. In her comments when introducing the bill, Bean said Rep. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, will likely hold hearings this fall on the issue of adopting a federal regulatory structure for the insurance industry.

At least some in the insurance industry favor the idea of federal regulation. Christopher Condron, CEO of AXA Equitable, said in a statement that "the time has come to recognize the substantial financial and non-financial costs to consumers of the current outdated state insurance regulatory structure." Today, he noted, an insurance company doing business nationally is subject to 56 sets of regulations--one for each state plus the District of Columbia and five U.S. territories.

AXA says the controversial federal regulatory structure would bring about needed change by eliminating inconsistent regulatory standards that stifle innovation and impede consumers' access to products and services; enhance consumer protections by initiating federal enforcement of a standardized set of rules; and streamline licensing procedures and compliance with market conduct rules by allowing insurers and producers to choose federal instead of state-by-state oversight.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.